Why enter British politics if you believe that? Baroness Nicholson is a former director of Save the Children, a former EU parliament's human rights committee member, she chairs an APPG againt human trafficking and she has done much more for charity. Nothing in common, eh?
-
-
Yeah, but has she been in EastEnders? And, um, well that’s it isn’t it?
1 reply 0 retweets 102 likes -
Replying to @Shatterface @megawhelmed and
She dragged the UK into the Iraq War you goddamn fucks
49 replies 3 retweets 206 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
That is really bizarre hyperbole and whataboutery. Why are you so keen to prevent her from speaking up on child safeguarding? What is your objection to child safeguarding?
4 replies 0 retweets 61 likes -
Replying to @CarolT52973604 @Shatterface and
I had no objection to child safeguarding until people like Nicholson redefined it to mean things like "banning same-sex marriage between adults, in order to protect the legal definition of the female sex-class"
3 replies 5 retweets 150 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
This is a rather blatant lie. Nowhere has the Baroness objected to sane-sex marriage in the current materials. As you well know. She is objecting to 13-year-olds being forced to discuss how to carry out anal sex. Why do you support this? Why do you want to sexualise children??
5 replies 0 retweets 64 likes -
Replying to @CarolT52973604 @Shatterface and
Arthur Chu Retweeted Emma Harriet Nicholson
She was and is an opponent of same-sex marriage and sees it as inherently linked to her mission of "protecting girls and women"https://twitter.com/Baroness_Nichol/status/1270703409931452416 …
Arthur Chu added,
Emma Harriet Nicholson @Baroness_NicholBecause I foresaw (with some justification) that it would lead to degrading the status of women and of girls.This as we now see has happened and is continuing,so my sex are as a binary class in difficult now. https://twitter.com/ItsKateActually/status/1270702271421177858 …2 replies 4 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Shatterface and
Your quote doesn't say what the "it" she is referring to in the first line is, so I have no idea what she is referring to there. I am strongly pro-same-sex marriage. That has no bearing on the fact I am also strongly pro-child safeguarding. I ask you again why you oppose it.
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CarolT52973604 @arthur_affect and
If you click on the tweet, it will take you to the conversation where you can read what she's referring to, which is why she voted against gay married.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @OwenAdamsYT @arthur_affect and
I've already explained I can't see that post! Screenshot it. This is what happens when your side is so block happy. Surprisingly enough, a 'no debate' position makes debate difficult.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Opening an incognito window is not particularly difficult
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.