Interesting. And looking back on 2020, say, in 50 years from now, how do you think people will view people supporting giving children the right to sign up for irreversible gender reassignment treatment before they are old enough to get a tattoo?
-
-
Replying to @megawhelmed @napguerreiro and
I think the trans people will be grateful they had the opportunity to live their lives as themselves and I don't care what any of the cis people think
3 replies 5 retweets 75 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @napguerreiro and
So you think a mind as brilliant as HG Wells could be stupid enough to support a dangerous, misguided fad of his time, but you'd never be at risk of doing something like that? For how many millions of years has life taken male and female forms?
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @megawhelmed @arthur_affect and
Biological sex is deeply inconsistent across species and even across individuals both in its genetic causes and its physical effects. Sex as it exists within humans bears only a superficial resemblance to sex as it exists in plants.
2 replies 0 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @AetherSquid @arthur_affect and
What? That's just plain wrong. Some species may have their quirks, but male and female individuals is pretty much *the most* consistent characteristic of complex organisms.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @n8inSLC @AetherSquid and
I've been to the zoo mate. That's enough for me.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
"Intersexfacts" is just a Twitter account made by Claire Graham to evade her Twitter ban after getting suspended for like the third or fourth time
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @XenaWorrier and
And now suspended yet again.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.