I fully believe this was an accident, but there's a reason lawsuits have a category for "negligence", especially "wanton and willful" or "reckless" negligence Just like jerking off in your office at work may not be intentional exhibitionism but it's not fucking okay
-
-
And yes, the sheer absurdity of the risk he was taking -- the Zoom call hadn't even actually *ended*, he was *still logged in* -- calls into question whether there wasn't some element of deliberate exhibitionism ("fear of getting caught") playing into it
1 reply 1 retweet 38 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @javimorillo
This is it. It's not like the call hadn't actually started and he thought he wasn't on video. It was in the middle of the meeting. He thought he'd turned his camera off, but FFS, he couldn't wait until it was over?
2 replies 0 retweets 22 likes -
Like, I don't think he intended to do it, but like Arthur said, if you're in a closed storage room at work and someone unexpectedly opens the door, you may not have intended anything, but still.
1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @jkfecke @javimorillo
This isn't the equivalent even of having sex in the bathroom in a locked stall or whatever, this is the equivalent of having sex IN HIS OFFICE with the DOOR AJAR
2 replies 2 retweets 28 likes -
It was so risky that it's like this tossup question "Does he have serious impulse control issues or does he have an actual voyeurism risk-of-getting-caught fetish" Either way it doesn't matter, it means he should no longer be trusted to work there
3 replies 2 retweets 34 likes -
And, really, this whole thing should be moot, he should've been fired when it came out he fucked a colleague's daughter, knocked her up, and tried to browbeat her into an abortion and when she wouldn't have one tried to duck out on child support He's not a good guy
2 replies 3 retweets 37 likes -
Sorry he what
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Arthur Chu Retweeted
Arthur Chu added,
This Tweet is unavailable.2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Didn’t know about this in Toobin’s past, but at least we’re all on the same page that this is about policing his morality
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
"Policing morality" is good, in fact In fact it's a necessary precondition of even having the categories "good" and "bad"
-
-
Well thank God moral policing has never resulted in bad things, like sexual minorities being denigrated, or grown adults acting like they’ve never engaged in any risky behavior!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yeah this is the Limbaugh talking point I was just referring to Acting like gay rights aren't a matter of trying to define what is and isn't moral but are a matter of abolishing morality entirely
1 reply 1 retweet 12 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.