The thing is if this exact scenario had played out with a female staffer resigning from the office of a male MP because of sexism you would never in a million years be talking about the MP's right to defend himself or carping about what counts as true retaliation
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @Liasalis and
“If the sexes were reversed” is such a weak argument. You’re arguing against me for arguing at all, not my argument.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @feministleaning @Liasalis and
I'm arguing against you for defending an MP who's come under investigation from the union for abusing their staff! Jesus Christ
2 replies 1 retweet 43 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @feministleaning and
Don't say "abuse", name the offense. Rape in an "abuse", threatening violence is an "abuse", what is the abuse you're referring to here? Be specific.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Liasalis @feministleaning and
Retaliation against whistleblowers by revealing their identity so people can go after them is very clear abuse
3 replies 1 retweet 28 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @feministleaning and
That's a very serious accusation, if true than Duffield should be arrested and charged with incitement to violence. Will you ask your contact to call the police and file a report, this is a hate crime matter that goes way beyond the jurisdiction of unions?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Liasalis @feministleaning and
Ah, so now we're moving onto "Why didn't you just call the cops then" How very familiar
1 reply 1 retweet 20 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Liasalis and
People's understanding of workplace protections and the law are so profoundly terrible. Even if an employer is being horrible to you in a way that is dangerous, it might still be legal. I found that out the hard way.
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Usually people who say "Why don't you call the cops?" know very well that the cops are snidely dismissive of most of the complaints they get, that's why they're saying it
1 reply 3 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Eristae and
Ian Rowe Retweeted kathy fletcher
Ian Rowe added,
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes
The idea that "innocent against proven guilty" means you can't even TALK about something someone did unless they've been charged with and convicted of a crime is, of course, feminist AF It is such a GOOD principle for supporting victims of abuse and assault
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @ianrw84 and
These are mostly civil matters anyway, right? The police will never in a billion years investigate a hostile work environment claim; it's not a criminal matter.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @mssilverstein @ianrw84 and
Notice the rapid slide toward "incitement to violence", like if I can't prove specific incitement to violence then breaching anonymity is suddenly just fine and totally aboveboard
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.