“If the sexes were reversed” is such a weak argument. You’re arguing against me for arguing at all, not my argument.
-
-
Replying to @feministleaning @Liasalis and
I'm arguing against you for defending an MP who's come under investigation from the union for abusing their staff! Jesus Christ
2 replies 1 retweet 43 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Liasalis and
I’m trying to understand the accusation because it doesn’t make sense to me. There was no doxxing. There was barely a sort of recognition of a picture of the staffer, when approached on a public forum about the topic of the staffer by someone eff holding a picture of the staffer.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @feministleaning @arthur_affect and
So, like, if you're in a thread with a bunch of people that hate someone, and you post a picture of them like, "This is that person you hate," that's pretty straightforwardly doxxing, yeah? No real wiggle room. You published their personal info, and in a troubling context.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @eggynack @feministleaning and
This was not substantially different, from what I can see. She pointed to an online picture and said, "This is the person you're looking for." If you think about it, this is just straight up how doxxing generally works anyway.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @eggynack @arthur_affect and
It is substantially different from what I can see.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @eggynack @arthur_affect and
Context and expectations of anonymity. I havent seen the anonymity clause that Arthur referenced, I didn’t read the article published and I didn’t see the comment, but based on the story explained in the actual motion above, it is a completely different context.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @feministleaning @arthur_affect and
Why should I expect less anonymity in someone else's avatar than in any random online image? Generally, the idea is that people who know you can identify you by sight and people who don't cannot.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eggynack @arthur_affect and
I’m not sure that’s a fair assumption given the reverse search Arthur mentioned as being known by everyone and used by everyone.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
This is the "Well your name is in the phone book" argument Most people don't run a reverse image search on every single image they happen to see on the Internet unless they've been told they have some reason to do so
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @feministleaning and
It's just doxing with extra steps isn't it?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EVE_Megarom @arthur_affect and
The extra steps matter because they weren’t her steps.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.