When a governing body has more Catholics in it than the actual percentage of Catholics in the population they control, you are, in fact, morally, ethically, and procedurally forbidden to introduce more Catholics
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Nymphomachy
FYI if this goes viral on conservative Twitter someone's going to go off on you about how the SCOTUS had a higher percentage of Jews than the population too
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
Yeah I mean I oppose putting too many Jews on the Supreme Court either, our lives are hard enough without having to constantly apologize for these dipshits
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Nymphomachy
In all seriousness if you forced the SCOTUS to match the US population's religious affiliation demographically you'd have two Catholics, two mainline Protestants, two evangelicals, two "nones", and one "Other"
3 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Nymphomachy
The one Other justice would be somewhat more Jewish than anything else, but they'd also have to be Muslim, Buddhist, and Hindu, and then a bunch of other things (a tiny little bit of Wiccan etc in there)
4 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
Anyway it might be somewhat better than we have now but I dunno I'm actually pretty glad we've never had an evangelical justice
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.