But wait!
We DON'T have any confirmation of @intersexfacts' realness
No blue check, no face pfp, not even a name or a location
We don't even know what gender they're supposed to be or in what way they're intersex
How very odd
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @ragtagop and
(It's actually really funny that "Intersexfacts" talks like this because she knows that we know that she's Claire Graham but everyone has to pretend we don't know that and this is an anonymous account or you'll get people yelling at you)
3 replies 3 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ragtagop and
Anyway, "Intersexfacts", if that is your real name, I think your pretending to speak for the intersex community is toxic and appropriative and demand you present your name, social security number, address and full medical history or else delete your account It's only fair
3 replies 1 retweet 23 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ragtagop and
I think Arthur Chu believes that they are Twitter-in-Chief. Fancy having the gall to demand ID from another twitter user! And just because the user in question provides facts again and again which undermine Chu’s own supposed expertise.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes, fancy the gall indeed It's the sort of behavior that might get your Twitter account banned several times in succession, until you make one with a deliberately generic name and then tell all your friends to follow it on Spinster and pretend we all don't know it's you
2 replies 1 retweet 23 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ragtagop and
You just retweeted yourself!!! Hahahahahahahaaaaa
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I did! Hahaha wow!!
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes -
-
Not as much as remaking my Twitter account after being banned several times in a row and then pretending to be an organization called "IntersexFacts" would be!
1 reply 1 retweet 17 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ragtagop and
It’s like you believe that being banned from Twitter somehow invalidates a person’s opinion, when most sane people are aware that Twitter bans are often based on certain partiality and /or faulty understanding of the Tweet content.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, but you just agreed that harassing people calling them sockpuppets and fakers demanding they post their medical history WAS harassment worthy of a ban
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.