Hi, this is only defensible as a non-homophobic argument if you agree this means the NHS shouldn't cover IVF for anyone, including infertile straight couples, who are by far the majority of the people using this service
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @GraceDarney @benjamincohen
Surrogacy is not paid for by the NHS Commercial surrogacy is banned in the UK
1 reply 2 retweets 69 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @GraceDarney @benjamincohen
The surrogate in this situation is Cohen's sister in law, I think it's safe to say she'll be a part of the child's life if she wants to be, so maybe you should complain about this issue to someone else
4 replies 2 retweets 79 likes -
Also, in a majority of cases, surrogates are employed by cishet couples In many of these cases the wife is able to produce ova but unable to conceive, and is therefore the egg donor for the pregnancy So the child does not have, by your definition, a single "real mother"
2 replies 4 retweets 82 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @feral_feminist @arthur_affect and
This reminds me of this situation I encountered when I was a kid when an adult I knew was opining how if we ever got to the point where we could grow kids in vats, it'd be a tragity because those kids would miss out on bonding with their mothers in the womb?
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Eristae @feral_feminist and
Perhaps you should read Brave New World which deals with this very situation.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Ah, yes, I also get all my bioethics from sexist men from the 1930s who desperately wanted to live under a tree on a tropical island somewhere
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.