Like if I took the child away from the woman they're genetically related to and gave them to the one whose uterus they gestated in I'm equally "taking them away from their mother", aren't I What a conundrum
-
-
You seem to be using this hypothetical situation as a ‘gotcha’ but this could never happen in the first place if surrogacy was outlawed, which I believe the people you are arguing with are in favour of.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Yes, banning something altogether so you never have to think about the definitions of words is a common TERF strategy for dealing with the complexities of the world, what of it
5 replies 4 retweets 75 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
1 reply 8 retweets 30 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ape_bass @thecuntykind and
Hey the New Statesman were the ones who decided to interview her
1 reply 1 retweet 19 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ape_bass @thecuntykind and
Calling a very clearly written paragraph "word salad" and acting like you can't understand it isn't helping your case the way you think it is
1 reply 2 retweets 47 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
The New Statesman interview is not from 1998, it is from 2020, and I can understand it perfectly
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ape_bass @arthur_affect and
Oh, that one is easy: You ask the person if they're male, female or non-binary if you're not sure.
1 reply 1 retweet 26 likes
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.