No, because according to your own explanation, you she had a medical condition that prevented her from being able to nurse. This isn't some insane standard people have. But surrogacy is dangerous and putting mother and baby through that for a designer (ME ME ME) baby is gross.
-
-
The line between "GenderCrit" and "GenderTrad" is more of a gradient at this point.
-
And the talk of "natural" this or that...I'm hardly the first one to speculate that American new agey , all natural crunchy wine mom types are perhaps an ignored fertile ground for TERFism and queerphobia. It's yet to happen in part because of quirks of American politics.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is absolutely the line that UK TERFbots are pulling at the moment – Times journalists are about 6 months behind (although catching up all the time)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The reason adoption is fine but surrogacy isn't is clearly that single moms, like gay couples, are the bad kind of family.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.