I despise the "JK Rowling was rejected by twelve publishers before publishing Harry Potter" factoid because it's characterized as some kind of triumphant upending of the clueless literary establishment and not multiple professionals recognizing it was completely derivative work
-
-
You also lost some powerful sarcasm. Jesus; so I suggest being nice and I get school yard dogpiled...think about that. My original point was don't be mean to others and you respond with...hmmm
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now, tell me this; did I attack trans rights or say anything in opposition to them? Did I say I support JKR? No I did not. You assumed attack from someone holding a very slightly different point of view to yours. Someone who does not disagree with you and 1/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2/ deeply respects and believes in LGBTQIA rights and always has. I just believe in taking the high road and doing it better than ones "enemies" or maybe convincing ones opponents to change their minds instead. What I've seen here is simply attacking someone who asked a
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
3/ perfectly valid question and raised a valid point. What if people start cancelling or gatekeeping trans LGBTQ literature? Must we descend to the level of the people we oppose or do we let their insults wash over us and harm us not
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
4/ holding our heads up high while they get all anxious about why we're not crying or appear to be ignoring them...anyway, point very unintentionally made.
-
You have typed roughly 10x more words to me than I have to you
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.