Yeah just FYI there is no such thing as a boycott that doesn't have collateral damage The whole reason boycotts are hard is that when you punish a whole company or organization, the workers on the bottom suffer more than the owners at the top
-
-
It's not like there aren't a ton of poor people who desperately need their paycheck who would theoretically get hurt short-term from a successful boycott of Amazon, or Chick Fil-A, or a racist bus company
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Arguably a boycott of a completed video game is less harmful to workers than a boycott of something like Amazon - boycott Amazon and workers could lose jobs all over. Boycott a single game and the devs have been paid; worst case is some aren't employed for a non-existent sequel.
-
The video game industry already has a habit of laying off half their staff after a game has been shipped - honestly boycotting the game so it doesn't make as much profit would probably make little difference to the paths of the devs who actually worked on it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.