The point of pride parades is to reject the idea of a single definition of what is and isn't a "fetish", I went over this in that original thread and I'm tired of the topic
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think that it was defined as such in 1970, when Pride started in the aftermath of Stonewall, and that Pride was about solidarity among everyone stigmatized because of a normative idea of sexuality inherent in the term "fetish" as a stigma
1 reply 1 retweet 36 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The words "we've all agreed" are doing a lot of work there.
1 reply 0 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @Jesin00 @arthur_affect and
Nobody ever talks about someone having a breast fetish
1 reply 3 retweets 13 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yeah and I don't care what people consider a "mainstream" anything
0 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Okay, and that's why the concept of "fetish" is oppressive
2 replies 1 retweet 15 likes
That was my point, there is an official definition of "fetish" and it's a lie, no one actually uses it, it just means "thing we perceive as weird in a sexual way"
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I answered your question and I really don't want to keep on talking to you because I dislike you intensely
0 replies 1 retweet 27 likes
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.