Uber is explicitly obligated to fire any driver who refuses service to a rider with a service animal, according to the terms of their lawsuit settlement with the National Federation for the Blind If you have an issue with this policy, take it up with NFB https://twitter.com/docnifkin_md/status/1304556884662398976 …
-
-
The settlement was a way for Uber to try to make this go away They're allowing NFB to impose conditions on them that make them act like the drivers' boss for *this issue and this issue only* so they could avoid a ruling on the underlying issue of whether drivers are employees
-
See, now that's where this was a "win" for Uber. By contractually precluding any of their own discretion, they're not acting as an employer.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.