Containment was always the ONLY option It's an expensive strategy and a harsh one, sure, and unsexy, as opposed to humming supercomputers trying to synthesize a vaccine or some basement biochemist discovering a miracle cure through One Weird Trick But IT WORKS
-
-
Don't neglect that even if would have been expensive, it still would have been less expensive than this shitshow is gonna be in the end.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But that would mean the rich and powerful would have to admit the poor need things legitimately, and that it has nothing to do with the notion of "poor=lazy" and "rich=hardworking". We can't have our cherished notions of class supremecy challenged, even at gunpoint!
-
This is exactly correct
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The pandemic was always going be expensive. Whichever way you did it. But hard lockdowns saves money in the long run. The US is spreading out the cost and making the wrong people pay for it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I will never shut up about reminding people that “herd immunity” as they’re using those words means nothing more than allowing millions of people to die as if we lived in a paleolithic world without medicine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Annnnnddd followed.
-
Same!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Anyone whining about how expensive lockdown is should compare Taiwan’s 2020Q2 economic statistics with America’s.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.