Irene turns out to be his level smart, Reverse Uno's him on a stake out (notably saying "Good Night, Mr. Holmes" once she's confirmed his identity) and then Irene gets married, takes her photo insurance and books it the fuck for America before Holmes and the King know she's gone.
-
Show this thread
-
She leaves a taunting photo for the King to remember her by, he reveals that he's very much Not Over It, and then Holmes, in a move that everyone assumes is romantic, asks for the photograph in lieu of payment.
1 reply 2 retweets 75 likesShow this thread -
It's not romantic. This is the Yellow Face all over again. Only it's much, much worse. The one thing that Holmes always did was protect the vulnerable, and this case had "Bad Idea" written all over it. Not the least of which is that Irene only wanted to be left alone.
1 reply 6 retweets 104 likesShow this thread -
Why bother taking photos from someone who just wants you to go away if the answer is anything honest? But Holmes allowed himself to be blinded by a paycheck. He didn't allow himself to see that he was violating his own principles.
2 replies 2 retweets 97 likesShow this thread -
Even worse was what would have happened if Irene had been anything less than who and what she was. If she had been less quick on the uptake, or even a little less quick on her feet, she would have been left facing a KING without any protection at all.
1 reply 2 retweets 92 likesShow this thread -
The only thing that saved Irene from Holmes's mistake was Irene. And he knew it. He knew the moment they opened the safe that he was on the wrong side, and that Irene had saved herself from him as much as from the King of Bohemia.
1 reply 7 retweets 136 likesShow this thread -
It wasn't romantic. It was evidence that Holmes had a conscience, and that he was aware of how catastrophic things could be if he wound up on the wrong side of justice. I really wish somebody would do THAT take in one of these adaptations.
12 replies 17 retweets 309 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @CWGaither
Watson's protesting too much that Holmes didn't have any hint of prurient interest in Adler was inviting readers to close that gap in their imaginations and Holmes was right to be pissed at Watson for even bringing it up
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CWGaither
And the whole character tic of Holmes never referring to Adler by name but as "The Woman" probably wasn't the romantic love Doyle implied it could be (by having Watson stridently deny it) It's much more in character as a way for Holmes to remind himself of his failure
2 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
EXACTLY. And framed by Watson's unreliable narration, you tend to miss it. I mean any discussion of Holmes' romantic life and lackthereof is academic. But the romance with Adler, specifically, has never seemed to fit well. Every take has to change her too much to make it work.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Yeah -- resurrecting this for a sec, what info we manage to get about canon Irene Norton (née Adler) is that she's TIRED of whatever femme fatale shenanigans she may or may not have been involved with All of her actions in the actual story are to AVOID tangling with powerful men
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @CWGaither
She seems to be marrying Godfrey Norton because he's a decent, normal guy who doesn't have any big mission in life with a big ego to match and a need to win her as a prize to back that up She wants the hell away from the King because she wants out of dealing with men like that
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CWGaither
So actually getting tangled up with Sherlock seems like it'd be WORSE than staying entangled with the King It'd be the worst possible thing she could do
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.