We'll have to agree to disagree about whether a teenage girls' parents are responsible or not for at least trying to keep her safe online from predators. As for the perp, he should be in therapy or jail, or both.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
So you think that parents should “protect” their child by ... spying on her and forbidding her from engaging in her own sexuality? Plus, we have literally *no idea* what her parents did or didn’t do. For all we know they had every child proofing app known to man installed.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Right, the argument for negligent parents seems to be that this situation happened at all, followed by the fact that the dad didn't literally beat a 12-year-old boy to death
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
While the argument for letting the guy walk after he's admitted to a crime is that we're all going to just be really upset about it but oh well, and forget it the next day? Fine, when he fails as a politician he can work at your church youth group.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
He was 12 years old, and I think not charging 12-year-old kids criminally is a generally good practice by the State of KS
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yep. Kids need behavioural interventions, not jail. The system may have failed here, as he clearly continues to exhibit similar behaviour, but not charging a 12 year old with a crime isn’t a bad thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Moreover his offense from when he was 14, which I think is morally just as disturbing as his other offense, is the kind of thing that's notoriously difficult to charge criminally at all Theoretically it falls under harassment but the bar for criminal charges there is really high
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @alixplicitly and
And I'm not sure you really want to lower that bar - do you want to make it easier for Donald Trump to accuse people who reply "Fuck you" to every one of his tweets of being stalkers who should go to prison
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @alixplicitly and
I think it's the kind of thing where even if you're not a full on prison abolitionist the "carceral solution" is really hard to argue for
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I know I have very strong opinions on who's a creepy stalker online and who's just calling people out on their shit and I know people who have just as strong opinions that are totally wrong and I'm not confident I would get put in charge of deciding who goes to jail and not them
-
-
Honestly so much of this just seems besides the point. It doesn’t matter who should have done what, or whose parents failed at what. He should not, just 5 years later, be running for office. Esp. when he’s exhibited similar behaviour towards the opposing campaign manager
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @alixplicitly @arthur_affect and
“How could this have happened?” is irrelevant. Some people suck. And those people probably shouldn’t be senators.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.