On the one hand, you have Aaron Coleman's atrocious personal record of being an abusive individual On the other hand, you have his total lack of relevant accomplishments, experience, skills and relationships as a legislator But he DID say "Medicare for All" on social mediahttps://twitter.com/BMarchetich/status/1297277488456818688 …
-
Show this thread
-
I'm all for saying that in current politics we possibly treat being a decent person and being good at your job as too important compared to having correct opinions ("good politics") I think it's very dangerous when people say the first two things don't matter AT ALL
1 reply 2 retweets 57 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @arthur_affect
The tweet you're quoting says the exact opposite of that.. Again, look forward to hearing you explain to me why you're refusing to vote for Biden vs Trump because of his history of sexual assault, if you ever bother to.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BMarchetich
The argument that Aaron Coleman would be a better representative than Stan Frownfelter because of Coleman's "position on abortion" is identical to the argument that you should vote for Donald Trump because he's "against war"
2 replies 3 retweets 49 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @BMarchetich
1) I don't think political positions outweigh character and competence, particularly since Frownfelter is quite a bit more amenable to compromise than you're making him out to be 2) It doesn't even matter because I don't give a single ounce of credence to Coleman's "positions"
2 replies 1 retweet 36 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @BMarchetich
He's a fucking 19-year-old shitposter who ran for the seat as a stunt with no expectation of winning, he has zero credibility I wouldn't trust him to watch my apartment over the weekend, much less trust him to represent me in office
3 replies 3 retweets 77 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
But you trust Frownfelter, who curtailed abortion rights. Picking and choosing principles, because when it comes down to it, this is about siding with power.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BMarchetich
Frownfelter voted with an overwhelming Republican majority for a restriction on D&E abortions, a vote I disagree with He also voted with the Democrats against an anti-abortion constitutional amendment last year, a vote I agree with In neither case was he the deciding vote
2 replies 1 retweet 18 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @BMarchetich
He is not a perfect candidate by any means, but he's not a bad enough candidate to justify primarying him "by any means necessary", including putting an incompetent loose-cannon nobody with a history of abusive behavior into the seat because he says "abortion rights!" on Facebook
2 replies 2 retweets 29 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
I'm just glad you've found a way to personally come to peace with your hypocrisy.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
All voting is harm reduction and I don't see a single harm that would actually be reduced by putting Coleman in his seat You know that the Republicans would have a majority either way, right
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect
Even in Kansas, one vote can make a difference, particularly to the actual people potentially harmed by the actions of its government. If you're not one of those people, I understand why moral preening for social media points is a higher priority.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BMarchetich
Jesus Christ "moral preening" I'm pretty sure you don't live in Kansas either and you're not in the demographic of people typically worried about being abused or assaulted or seeing that behavior modeled by people in power
4 replies 1 retweet 21 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.