Yeah and the threshold for how willing you are to judge someone based on their past should be very high when it comes to throwing them into prison but very low when it comes to electing them into office Why is this so hard to understand
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @geniecoefficnt
His victims, who know him a lot better as a human being than you or I do, think he's unfit for office based on their experiences I think it's perfectly fair to take their advice in that regard, because electing someone is a big fucking deal
4 replies 5 retweets 105 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @geniecoefficnt
Has nothing to do with him being free to live his life He can live his life without having a position of public power over other people, most people do
2 replies 5 retweets 105 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
ah, so now you've tossed out the notion of redemption - no waiting periods, no "clean record" exemption - he's barred for life. You've switched arguments, but aside from that, somehow I suspect you'd find exceptions to this fixed rule in any number of circumstances
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @geniecoefficnt
I don't have a fixed policy I have in mind that I think should be written into the constitution, but I think that if his victims don't trust him to hold public office the decent thing to do is for the voters to listen
1 reply 1 retweet 41 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @geniecoefficnt
I think it's *more likely* that if it had been 20 years since it happened and he'd actually done something in that time to demonstrate he'd changed his victims would be willing to forgive him, but that's ultimately up to them, not me
2 replies 2 retweets 53 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @geniecoefficnt
I think it's completely fucking obvious why calling them unreasonable for not forgiving him just because five years passed and he has his GED now is bullshit though I actually can't imagine forgiving someone under those circumstances
1 reply 2 retweets 48 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @geniecoefficnt
"why are you still mad about this, i said i have moved on" is not an apology! actual contrition begins with publicly stating what you've done. he tries to minimize his crimes, calls it 'just a little cyberbullying.' he's not even at the first step of contrition.
2 replies 4 retweets 67 likes -
he hasn't made restitution to those he's wronged, he hasn't demonstrated that he's changed his behavior, his victims certainly haven't forgiven him. show me contrition and i'll consider not calling him a misogynist shitbag.
1 reply 1 retweet 39 likes -
Replying to @perdricof @geniecoefficnt
If you watch the video of Glenn's interview with the guy, Glenn actually opens it up for him to say "from his own mouth" what, exactly, it is he did and how bad it was and why it was so bad And he fucking ducks it -- he doesn't at any point say "I blackmailed a girl for nudes"
1 reply 3 retweets 33 likes
It's such fucking shit It's not worth watching the video, you don't get any information from it you wouldn't get from reading about it But I fucking dare you to watch the video and say this looks like someone who actually seems remorseful AT ALL
-
-
When he's asked to say "from his own mouth" what he did, he DOESN'T say it, he immediately deflects onto "My dad was struggling with mental illness, my mom didn't have a lot of resources" WHO CARES SAY IT from your mouth -- "I told a girl to kill herself repeatedly for a year"
3 replies 2 retweets 35 likes -
When asked "What evidence do the voters have that you've changed?" he immediately brings up how he has the most progressive policy platform of any candidate for the KS House and pivots into attacking Stan Frownfelter for how much he sucks Like Jesus Christ
3 replies 3 retweets 20 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.