I think what gets me about the Aaron Coleman situation is that, call me an old conservative fart all you like, but electing a 19-year-old to office at all is *already a huge risk* The fact that someone's 19 is already a huge negative, and any further negatives are disqualifying
-
-
Like if he were in his 40s and had 20 years or more of track record of being a stand-up guy and a decent member of the community then this story would still give me great pause about electing him to office, but I could see the argument for it Not if it happened five years ago
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.