I think what gets me about the Aaron Coleman situation is that, call me an old conservative fart all you like, but electing a 19-year-old to office at all is *already a huge risk* The fact that someone's 19 is already a huge negative, and any further negatives are disqualifying
-
-
Sexual harassment should be a disqualifying factor by itself, so why is this discourse happening by ignoring it's existence?
-
I mean, because I do to some extent agree that judging people for what they did at the age of 13 is unfair But that's because usually we're talking about people for whom 13 was a long time ago
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.