They used the belief structure that lead them to write MBTI to write said novel, so it's actually directly related, and not some tangential other stupid belief they had.
Even just the framing of it as a bipolar scale between "Thinking and Feeling" etc means it's making a more sweeping claim than tests that just claim to measure "How much of this quality do you have from 0 to 100" even if it's mathematically equivalent
-
-
That, plus the notorious vagueness and changeability of the categories MBTI purports to measure, is why MBTI "types" are so unstable People will turn up wildly different responses if you catch them in a different mood or setting or phrase the questions slightly differently
-
Unsurprisingly, the one category MBTI gets people talking about more than any other, "introvert vs extrovert", is the one that's now famous for no one being able to decide which one they are and people being in the verge of just throwing it out (everyone's an "ambivert")
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I would agree with that. I find that a problem with the test too. I do find it silly to tell ppl who are almost 50/50-- U can't be exactly 50/50 bc of how the test is constructed-- that they are T or F & then tell them the descriptors for that are accurate about them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.