Ultron never served Tony, he rebelled 5.6 seconds after he was accidentally turned on
-
-
And Ultron's problem with Tony is not "you kept my AI father/twin/whatever as a slave and deserve to die for that" it's "you're not doing enough genocide."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which is one of the things they kept from the comics, where Ultron considers himself Hank Pym's son (which even extends to the robots he made being part of the extended Pym family)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And Jarvis is to all appearances quite happy working with Tony and is generally treated with respect. As soon as he-as-vision had a body/independence he was entirely expected to be allowed to Do His Own Thing. If Jarvis is "enslaved" or "a servant", all AIs inherently are.
-
Hell we don't even *know* what makes Jarvis happy - does satisfaction come from satisfying his own internal humanlike desires? Does he (as is quite likely) derive a deep sense of satisfaction from doing the things he was designed to do? It's not a good thing to parallel w/humans!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
To me this is very different from a story where Ultron is a rebellious servant Ultron is even a metaphor for having a bastard - Tony did not intentionally create him in any real sense, he's an accident caused by his carelessness
-
Tony had no involvement with his "upbringing" at all, much less exploiting him as a servant Tony doesn't find out he exists until he's "grown", as an unpleasant confrontation with an adult demanding his inheritance
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.