If it's subjective, then, well, it's subjective I can like old stuff, you can like new stuff, neither of us is wrong But it will remain an empirical fact that the newer something is, the more currently living people will like it, because it was addressed to their tastes
-
-
Show this thread
-
Either way, current relevance matters, art gets stale over time, and almost all artistic work is eventually forgotten That's how it's supposed to go ("This too shall pass")
Show this thread -
I think the second POV is truer than the first, but people who hold the first POV and DON'T think that, if objective standards of quality exist, we get objectively better and better over time are assholes
Show this thread -
If you believe in "real, objective truth" about anything and yet you don't believe we learn more over time and are therefore better than our ancestors then what's the fucking point Of anything It's not respect to your elders, it's insulting them by saying their work was wasted
Show this thread -
The Golden Age narrative - things used to be perfect in the past and then they've steadily decayed since then, every generation can't help but be worse than the previous - is very culturally common, many of us instinctively fall back on it in hard times
Show this thread -
And it's cowardice It's shirking your own responsibility to learn more, work harder, and try to be better than your parents It's a way to make your decision to give up sound like a noble universal truth
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Three! Artistic quality is actually INTERSUBJECTIVE.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Objective isn't the same as quantifiable or reproducible. (I'd tied to concentrate on how it's significantly tied to context however you cut it)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.