Like someone who performatively goes "I'm an empath, I can't stand to see or hear or even think about a living thing in pain If there's an animal dying on TV you have to turn it off" "But do you eat meat?" "Yes but I could NEVER kill an animal myself"
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @loudpenitent and
Okay well... fine then But that kind of being an "empath" isn't a MORAL thing, at all It's not morality, it's an aesthetic preference If you yourself do think of it as morality, then that makes you a moral coward and a hypocrite
2 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @loudpenitent and
Arguably worse than someone who just openly doesn't give a shit about animals and thinks they're just piles of edible meat that happen to have faces If you think killing animals is *wrong*, *don't demand other people do something for you that you think is wrong*
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @loudpenitent and
If you can't sit through this video of how a slaughterhouse works, then fucking stop eating meat If you think becoming "desensitized" by watching this video until the blood and guts no longer bother you is making you a worse person, then fucking stop eating meat
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @loudpenitent and
It's really not, at all, an unreasonable ask As clownish as PETA et al can be, the overwhelmingly vicious negativity omnivores aim at vegans is because a lot of people really do feel "not having to think about stuff" is a right (and know it's not a justifiable one)
1 reply 1 retweet 26 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @loudpenitent and
(I took the challenge to watch the slaughterhouse video and I still eat meat I don't think that's necessarily a good decision, I certainly don't think it means I "passed a test" -- it's a totally meaningless gesture in the end But also, like, literally the least you can do)
3 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @loudpenitent and
Maybe so, but being willing to surrender one’s moral superiority and acknowledge that one isn’t a Good Person who Deserves Good Things is IMO important. That’s again something Christians nominally believe, until they start talking about suffering people having made “bad choices”
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @muddlewait @loudpenitent and
The thing about Christianity is that the radical humility they profess to aspire to is extremely rare and the person who has it wouldn't necessarily be a moral paragon but would at least be admirable for achieving such a different perspective from the depressing human default
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @muddlewait and
But of course they don't actually do it Of course they don't, the idea of such a person -- "Christlike" -- is exciting because it's almost impossible to be that It's so much easier and more rewarding to pretend you've become like that, but actually stay the same
1 reply 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @muddlewait and
Not that they're special -- Buddhists aren't all that enlightened as a class of people either, and atheist rationalbros aren't very rational But the Christian "born again" narrative makes the way they deal with constantly falling short of their ideal a real headtrip
2 replies 1 retweet 14 likes
(I say this from firsthand knowledge)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.