Like this is very much a relationship to fiction you see in two places. Fan works and games, in one case due to parasocial investment and in one agency. But games give you an absurd amount of agency, compared to real life. It's certainly not a more comprehensive morality.
-
-
Replying to @loudpenitent @arthur_affect and
I think the author is mistaking the sense of *power* and *joy* they receive from works like Undertale where there is an answer that leads to vicarious happiness with a sense of moral clarity. Moral heroism often *doesn't* feel good in the moment, even if it does in the end.
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Yeah I've been talking a lot about Orwell the past few days and he wrote an essay about the "tragic sense of life" that I think a lot about (it's ostensibly his deep dive into why Tolstoy hated Shakespeare so much and particularly King Lear)
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @loudpenitent and
It sounds silly to accuse smart educated adult people of this But it is very common in all of us, I think, to have that kneejerk response that "Hey if you the author made this happen, that means you *wanted* it to happen You made these people suffer, and that makes you evil"
2 replies 2 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @loudpenitent and
This is literally Tolstoy and Shakespeare Tolstoy, for whatever reason, specifically fixated on how much he hated King Lear And he thought the play made Shakespeare a *bad person*, that only someone with a "degraded moral sense" would set it up so Cordelia dies at the end
2 replies 3 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @loudpenitent and
And, like, it's a fair cop Tragedy isn't always good art, and a tragedy is always trying to say something about what the author sees as the rules of the world we live in, and you're allowed to hate that statement
1 reply 2 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @loudpenitent and
But if you just flat-out reject the tragic sense of life completely, you're in denial about something You're running away from truth, you're refusing to confront what is the fundamental basis, the definition, of *having a moral sense at all* to begin with
1 reply 3 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @loudpenitent and
Like, look, the whole definition of being a good person means being good even if it doesn't actually work out in the end If you need to know whether it will all work out before you do anything good, you're not actually a good person You're a fake good person
1 reply 6 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @loudpenitent and
We all fucking know that, and yet moral guardians in every era seem to demand that the world of fiction wipe away this basic truth so that the imaginary world it presents us instead can be "inspiring" and "hopeful"
2 replies 3 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @loudpenitent and
And it's not like there's no place for that But if you live in that escapist fantasy all the time, you become thoughtless and stupid, and when you become thoughtless and stupid, you become an asshole At least you should consider that, if you think fiction affects culture
1 reply 4 retweets 22 likes
Alan Moore went in hard on this in his take on Watchmen There's something very specifically American about Superman He's the world's strongest man because he's the world's righteous man and vice versa
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @loudpenitent and
On the one hand it's an inspiring story of hope and escapist fantasy to cling to for members of the underclass who have never seen power wielded other than to oppress etc etc etc On the other hand, it's *fucked up*
2 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
Mm. On the third hand, Alan Moore ain't exactly oppressed. So it's just kinda a mess.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.