I am not, by any stretch, an advocate of applying infinite charity to everyone, especially people in power Quite the opposite It doesn't matter if someone is saying 2+2=4 or 2+2=5, if they're saying it because they're a Nazi, punch them in the face
-
-
And he lies to them all the time And they eat it up He does not need sophisticated language or clouds of obfuscatory jargon to lie He just lies The lack of any attempt to disguise the lie *helps him lie*
-
As long as he ‘owns the Libs’ that’s all they care about.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
But his straight talk isn’t actually straight talk. Straight talk is science. His base is manipulating Orwell’s ideas and if your critique is Orwell made his ideas too easy to manipulate, that’s fair I guess.
-
I'm not sure - I think it's a tough question. The frustrating thing about science is that while it puts a high value on truth and dedicates itself to the pursuit of truth, it's therefore compelled to conclude that we don't know what the truth is. So scientists equivocate.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah. I think there's a case to be made, though I'm not well-read enough to make it, that Orwell was an important critic of modernism, but when applied to post-modernism, is almost comically wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.