Even if we grant that some hypothetical reaction may pull matter out of the air that's still 5 total grams when you include whatever nitrogen or whatever gets sucked in. That is not even to say, of course, that such a reaction exists in the first place.
-
-
We got to the Moon with shockingly low accuracy numerical methods, by modern standards. At some level NASA was doing "2+2=5" math despite being state of the art at the time
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is this the part where significant portions of what we "see" is just your brain filling in blanks?
-
Content-aware fill the whole blindspot. Twice
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I have an entire (extremely good) book about color-correction in Photoshop, and one of the things it spends a LOT of time on is how much what a camera sees looks "wrong" without correction, because eyes don't see anything like cameras.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As a mechanical engineer, what I see is 2 +/- some acceptable tolerance range + 2 +/- some acceptable tolerance range = 4 (nominal) +/- the sum of your accumulated tolerances. Not sure who's point that serves, but every thing we make/measure exists within a range.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.