This brand of conservatism - its sheer *laziness*, the smugness of its incuriosity and intellectual indolence - Orwell had no respect for He straight up did not think it could survive the 20th century, period, not with the massive constant change outside your window
-
-
Hence the "right wing", as such, just isn't there in 1984 He predicted the Tories, the Church, old school tradcons, just wouldn't survive, they'd crumble and vanish and the choice was authoritarian vs liberatory revolution
1 reply 2 retweets 20 likes -
That was a massive miscalculation on his part, and it's why I think 1984, despite being a classic, is such a flawed book The fact that Orwell hated conservatives so much and yet conservatives adopted him so readily obviously means he fucked up
1 reply 3 retweets 32 likes -
But in any case, you are the Party in this analogy, you understand You've turned truisms like "2+2=4" into a *slogan*, something you just say without thinking about what it means, and getting mad when challenged to do that thinking That's what Newspeak is
1 reply 2 retweets 18 likes -
A chopped down, simplified language to, as you put it, maintain a single common coherent point of view without ambiguity He thought that was a bad thing
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Newspeak was a "language of tautologies" To be a doubleplusgood duckspeaker was to just say a bunch of shit that conveyed no information other than the signal "I am speaking obvious truths"
2 replies 1 retweet 19 likes -
"Ingsoc good, Party plusgood, Big Brother doubleplusgood, crimethink ungood" That's you right now Like how do you not see that's you
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
you should tell them about the imaginary numbers, arthur like the part where they were called imaginary as an insult, like there were so-called mathematicians who just stamped their feet and said "it's common sense, it's OBVIOUS, there is no number the square of which is -1"
2 replies 1 retweet 19 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Drawing the complex number plane with the real numbers as the x-axis and the imaginary numbers as the y-axis kind of intuitively explains what the idea here is pretty well I think
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.