Like you understand he was a leftist, a radical, somewhere on the anarchist spectrum He despised conservatives (he refused to say the word "Tory" in his writing as opposed to the slur "blimps")
-
-
I remember the feeling of reading one of my childhood favs tearing hard into another one of my favs Orwell's review of CS Lewis' Mere Christianity, which he said was not only intellectually worthless but "sinister"
2 replies 1 retweet 19 likes -
This highly educated Oxford don adopting this avuncular, charming, informal tone to reassure the plebs that the world isn't complicated, it's simple That this reactionary theistic worldview the Church has shoved down our throats for centuries is common sense, it stands to reason
1 reply 1 retweet 17 likes -
This disbelief in progress - moral progress, intellectual progress, material progress ("I have seen both, in an egg, we call it going bad in Narnia") This dismissal of the idea that the human race, over time, continues to learn things
1 reply 2 retweets 11 likes -
Hence everything that's happened since Aquinas wrote the Summa Theologica is just modern fluff and nonsense It's all heresies refuted by theologians long ago You can forget about it The truth is obvious, it's common sense, it's what we've always known for a fact
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
This brand of conservatism - its sheer *laziness*, the smugness of its incuriosity and intellectual indolence - Orwell had no respect for He straight up did not think it could survive the 20th century, period, not with the massive constant change outside your window
2 replies 3 retweets 21 likes -
Hence the "right wing", as such, just isn't there in 1984 He predicted the Tories, the Church, old school tradcons, just wouldn't survive, they'd crumble and vanish and the choice was authoritarian vs liberatory revolution
1 reply 2 retweets 20 likes -
That was a massive miscalculation on his part, and it's why I think 1984, despite being a classic, is such a flawed book The fact that Orwell hated conservatives so much and yet conservatives adopted him so readily obviously means he fucked up
1 reply 3 retweets 32 likes -
But in any case, you are the Party in this analogy, you understand You've turned truisms like "2+2=4" into a *slogan*, something you just say without thinking about what it means, and getting mad when challenged to do that thinking That's what Newspeak is
1 reply 2 retweets 18 likes -
A chopped down, simplified language to, as you put it, maintain a single common coherent point of view without ambiguity He thought that was a bad thing
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes
Newspeak was a "language of tautologies" To be a doubleplusgood duckspeaker was to just say a bunch of shit that conveyed no information other than the signal "I am speaking obvious truths"
-
-
"Ingsoc good, Party plusgood, Big Brother doubleplusgood, crimethink ungood" That's you right now Like how do you not see that's you
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
you should tell them about the imaginary numbers, arthur like the part where they were called imaginary as an insult, like there were so-called mathematicians who just stamped their feet and said "it's common sense, it's OBVIOUS, there is no number the square of which is -1"
2 replies 1 retweet 19 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.