I said nothing about rounding up or down, just rounding. But in fact rounding up has been a problem. And then you speak of qualifications...! Quite the multilayered gaslighting operation you've got going. One quick example for your reference:https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/22/sec-investigates-whether-companies-round-up-earnings.html …
-
-
Well that's a fun fact I didn't know, and that I kind of doubt you knew until you googled it just now to own me What of it
3 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Aya62335284 and
Note that this fun paper - which is indeed a cool paper - jokes about the term "quadrophobia", fear of the number four It is arguing that earnings reports improperly round up rather than down when the digit in question is 4, rather than 5 or higher
1 reply 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Aya62335284 and
It does NOT say that the SEC should ban the concept of rounding altogether in earnings reports and they should be printed with as many significant digits as the paper will hold Because that's absurd
2 replies 1 retweet 11 likes -
Neither did I specifically say that. You're misrepresenting. You denied manipulation of rounding on Wall Street, I just gave you an example of it. Whether or not the SEC bans it is irrelevant. Accept that you were wrong instead of arguing for alternative meaning (like 2+2=5).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yeah I said I didn't know about that It's a fun little story, it seems unlikely to come to anything unfortunately because it's so difficult to prove It's also a demonstration of my point, not a refutation of it
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Aya62335284 and
I mean the point of the article is that sometimes 2+2 should equal 5 (when the sum of the mantissa being rounded off both numbers is higher than 5) Sometimes it shouldn't Companies are exploiting the edge case between should and shouldn't
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Aya62335284 and
Your other article cheekily argues we could avoid this situation entirely if we made it a rule to always round down (truncate) It then goes on to point out that there are obvious real world cases where doing this is perverse
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Aya62335284 and
And that most importantly truncating when people EXPECT you to round could lead to disaster (especially on the stock market, which is entirely driven in the short term by wild emotional guesswork) Hence the important thing is deciding on a consistent standard
2 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
“Hence the important thing is deciding on a consistent standard.” Very good. 2 + 2 = 4.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
You're allowed to choose to do whatever you want but whether or not people go along with you depends on how well it works for the situation they're in
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.