You really are Dunning-Krugering your way through this thread. You are particularly resistant to the observation that shared knowledge of a concept can be incomplete, can evolve, etc.
-
-
I’m talking about basic communication to have meaningful exchanges about real things with mutual understanding & universality. Your use of math promotes an argument for “ways of knowing” a different discourse which has the precise goal of pushing subjectivities causing confusion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If I give someone two pairs of apples and tell them it’s five apples (because I’m using a different axiom), that would be confusing to them.
-
Yes it would, because it's a very complex idea requiring an examination of things everyone takes for granted.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.