The 2+2=5 examples are simply different languages. The symbols look the same, but they have different definitions, therefore different meanings. It is not a ‘new way of knowing’, but simply a different language.
-
-
Replying to @CanuckPlucky @borrfdad and
It’s like reading the word ‘barf’ and saying ‘but that means ‘snow’ in Farsi! You’re excluding all the Farsi people when you teach it with the English meaning. We need to look at Farsi when learning English.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CanuckPlucky @borrfdad and
It’s not that learning Farsi (or base 3) are wrong. It’s that it’s not the convention, so it’s basically a waste of time and effort, for the sole purpose of feeling ‘inclusive’.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CanuckPlucky @borrfdad and
Okay so you're basically saying that it's too much effort to be smart so it's better to be stupid
1 reply 1 retweet 26 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CanuckPlucky and
No one is saying that small children need to all spend the time and effort required to be bilingual in English and Farsi But becoming conversant with the *concept of multiple languages* is absolutely vital, yes
1 reply 1 retweet 26 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CanuckPlucky and
A kid isn't fully educated if they don't fully grok the concept that there's nothing inherently funny about the syllable "barf" just because it means one thing in English and a different thing in a different language
1 reply 1 retweet 19 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CanuckPlucky and
This isn't about being "sensitive" or "not hurting people's feelings" this is about *not being stupid* Or, as we call it, cultural competence You are advocating *being stupid* (being completely used to one particular system of symbols and unable to think on a level above them)
1 reply 3 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @CanuckPlucky and
It is very easy to be stupid, Americans in particular who rarely get challenged on matters of cultural competence are particularly prone to it -- "I don't have an accent, I talk normally" -- and it is in the long run very dangerous and very harmful
2 replies 4 retweets 29 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @borrfdad and
Do Americans not have a social studies or geography class where they study other cultures? If they do, and that class is failing, why use math class to teach this? # finishing school without basic math and eng. literacy is staggering. You'd have them run before they can crawl?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CanuckPlucky @arthur_affect and
I mean... can you explain to me how cultural competence will help Adults answer a question as simple as this? Or is a kid "fully educated" if they can explain the traditional counting method of Aztecs, but can't read a table and graph?pic.twitter.com/fyldBJPR2p
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Right, the problems with American education are all down to "wokeness" in the curriculum and nothing to do with poverty and access Fuck off
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @borrfdad and
For someone who knows more than average, your reading comprehension sucks. I don't think the problems are due to 'woke curriculum. Never said or implied that. But I don't think that adding 'woke' curriculum will do anything to help, and likely make it worse.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CanuckPlucky @borrfdad and
No, I pretty strongly think that anything that turns education into less of a slog treating students like programmable components of a machine is quite likely to help
1 reply 2 retweets 12 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.