This is not some new feminist discovery, this is just patriarchy Do you understand that in your scenario the population only actually does rebound in one generation if that 10% of surviving men each impregnates 9x as many women, whether they like it or not https://twitter.com/redclaireopatra/status/1287225388792512512 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Replying to @arthur_affect
God, I hate being told that my value is tied to my ability to pop out kids. It's always fun to be told that the older (and likely less fertile) I get, the less valuable I am. My biological clock! It's a mistake that I haven't reproduced, whatever else I do isn't as valuable!
4 replies 1 retweet 61 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Cyn Retweeted
Uh, you literally said that women are more valuable because of their reproductive capabilities. https://twitter.com/claireplusmac/status/1287225390889656322?s=19 …
Cyn added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
And you're just playing word games. "Men as a whole" and "Women as a whole" exist only because they are made up of individuals. I.E. me. Your ridiculous argument is why I get to spend my life with people flipping out because I'm in my 30s with no kids.
3 replies 1 retweet 24 likes -
Replying to @Eristae @a_useless_ham
"Men as a whole have more money than women as a whole, therefore JK Rowling is incapable of using her wealth to bully people because she is a member of the financially impoverished sex class"
4 replies 1 retweet 27 likes -
Who says that, exactly? You're projecting like the friggin batsign again mate.pic.twitter.com/u1cvPJDl5l
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
A ton of people defending her literally are saying it
-
-
Quote tweet please?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.