This is not some new feminist discovery, this is just patriarchy Do you understand that in your scenario the population only actually does rebound in one generation if that 10% of surviving men each impregnates 9x as many women, whether they like it or not https://twitter.com/redclaireopatra/status/1287225388792512512 …
-
-
It's this bizarre thing where all the crowing about how fertile cis men are "almost useless" ("You only need one to bank a hundred doses of sperm!") makes her oblivious to how this makes anyone who doesn't produce gametes at all "totally useless"
-
I feel like that attitude is also a good way to quell genetic diversity in a species at best, and at worst is a quick justification for eugenics. After all, 1 cis man can make 100+ babies, so why bother with those considered less by society?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not uteruses that can be used for creating the all-important next generation And no, given how ridiculous and implausible *any* Thanos-Snap scenario is, you really don't get to demand we only imagine the specific ones she made up
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.