In order for it to be even POSSIBLE to "enjoy lawns" you have to 1) Be rich enough to have a lawn 2) Be richer enough than that you can pay someone to mow your lawn 3) Be richer enough than THAT that this totally pointless expense doesn't piss you offhttps://twitter.com/christapeterso/status/1287650564013060101 …
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect
Suppose one has a lawn, I don't really understand what things that you can do with it that are fun. You can look at it, and you can stand/walk/run on it, but that's about all.
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @PossibleCabbage @arthur_affect
Look, I'm no fan of lawns, but standing/sitting/lying/walking/working out on grass feels good and it's no small thing. The real question is what is a better way than ownership to secure people's access to grassy patches.
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @matryoshka_core @PossibleCabbage
Owning your own lawn, much like owning your own treadmill, is a statement of wild optimism of how often you're going to use it and how much time/money you will therefore save over going to the gym/park that is for most people a massively losing investment
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
I mean if owning a lawn were really seen as optional when it came to owning a house I severely doubt it would actually be that popular
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Stagnating suburban housing market sure makes it look like people are a lot less willing to pay for it than they used to be
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @CleverSubtle @arthur_affect and
"same market" is an arbitrary division though.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.