I want to say that what I’m used to the implications being insofar as they’re different is “apologist” for “unpopular or demeaned, but it is assumed a reasonable observer would be on board with someone coming to their defense” versus “unapologetic” is for reprehensible things
-
-
It’s only in the amazing spider-man 2 that he explicitly *causes* someone to turn evil. In every other case he’s, at worst, a catalyst.
-
Yeah and even that wasn't really morally wrong per se, that was Spider-Man deciding to *not* participate in a mad science experiment likely to go horribly wrong, forcing Osborn to turn elsewhere
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Having just read the first 60-odd issues of Amazing Spider-Man, I don't think Spider-Man in any sense creates any of his early villains in the comics. You know who inadvertently creates several major Spider-Man villains? J. Jonah Jameson. Notably the Scorpion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.