What a joke. She's issued warnings to people who have very obviously libelled her. Two people, as far as I'm aware. Critics is a bizarre and partisan choice of words.
-
-
Replying to @paul_smortions @MFnP and
Show me the libelous statements. I've been asking for them from you jokers for a full day now, and nobody's been able to actually provide them. It's like the statements weren't actually libelous, and were fully opinion, and you know you can't defend JKR against reality.
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paul_smortions @MFnP and
That's an opinion. I have the same opinion: I wouldn't trust JKR around my children, and if she wants to try and sue me for it she can see me in US court.
1 reply 2 retweets 19 likes -
JKR apparently felt it met the standards for libel. Spurling's lawyers apparently agreed. But Sam the web developer believes he knows better. In my judgement, you don't really care about vexatious litigation. You just want people to have free rein to attack a woman you dislike.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @paul_smortions @MFnP and
JKR felt she had the money to hire lawyers for however long it was necessary, and Spurling knew even winning the lawsuit would be financially devastating. I have lawyers on retainer, and the US's defamation laws include anti-SLAPP provisions.
1 reply 0 retweets 18 likes -
It's pretty obvious that saying someone is a danger to children is grounds for a libel action. You don't care about that though.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @paul_smortions @MFnP and
Look it up, Einstein. Opinions are not defamation under the law (either US or UK).
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
"Rowling has made it clear that she can no longer be trusted around children". I was 20 years a journalist. I know, without question, that statement is over the line. It's not presented as an opinion.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @paul_smortions @Azuaron and
The difference between a statement of fact and a statement of opinion does not in any sense rely on "magic words" like using the phrase "in my opinion" People who think there's any semantic difference between "You're evil" and "In my opinion you're evil" are incredibly tedious
3 replies 4 retweets 31 likes
The honest opinion exemption in the Defamation Act seems pretty clear to me As long as the facts referred to by the opinion are true, the opinion isn't defamatory, regardless of whether you think the chain of logic from the facts to the opinion is reasonable or has merit
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @paul_smortions and
"JK Rowling is in favor of medical gatekeeping I believe this harms children Therefore, I believe JK Rowling is harmful to children" As long as the first sentence is true, this can't be defamation, even if you think my beliefs are terrible and wrong
2 replies 5 retweets 43 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @paul_smortions and
Just like "Arthur is Asian, I believe all Asians are communists, therefore I believe Arthur is a communist" It's shitty and racist and the person should be publicly shamed for it, but it doesn't fit the definition of libel
2 replies 2 retweets 27 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.