She's provably doing that. In at least two instances she's used her lawyers to threaten financial ruin on her critics, when said critics either disparaged her with regard to children, or informed children of her stated views.
-
-
lol tried watching that Mauler guys response to Hbombs Dark Souls 2 video and after 30 minutes (of 9 hours) that was literally his only point; Harris doesnt say "in my opinion" before every sentence
-
hardly surprising, their arguments only work if they can cherry-pick quotes and factoids out of context and ignore everything else.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The honest opinion exemption in the Defamation Act seems pretty clear to me As long as the facts referred to by the opinion are true, the opinion isn't defamatory, regardless of whether you think the chain of logic from the facts to the opinion is reasonable or has merit
-
"JK Rowling is in favor of medical gatekeeping I believe this harms children Therefore, I believe JK Rowling is harmful to children" As long as the first sentence is true, this can't be defamation, even if you think my beliefs are terrible and wrong
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.