You don’t ‘show’ where defamation occurs on Twitter, mate. You test it in court. Or you apologise before it reaches court because you’re advised you’ll lose. I hope that helps.
-
-
Replying to @MFnP @supersarr and
Defamation is an intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation. There are laws that impose penalties on defamatory statements. Holy shit, your vocabulary is so bad for someone who frequently criticisms other people's reading skills.
3 replies 0 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @Azuaron @supersarr and
Not in UK law. Search for defamation & intention.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MFnP @supersarr and
Holy shit is the "intentional" part not at issue, you absolute hack. Put up or shut up.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @Azuaron @supersarr and
You seem to be getting very angry about your misunderstanding of English law.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MFnP @supersarr and
What are you, a child, who thinks an argument can be deflected by yelling, "Look behind you!" Put up or shut up, hack. Where are the defamatory statements?
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @Azuaron @supersarr and
Again. There are no defamatory statements until a court has made a judgement. There may be potentially defamatory statement. I might think something is defamatory. You might think that. But until tested in court they are just statements.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This kind of legal philosophy is very useful when you want to take a disingenuously nihilistic view on whether a rich person is engaging in baseless legal bullying or not If it never goes to court I guess we'll never know right
1 reply 1 retweet 25 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @MFnP and
It's the kind of thing you say when you yourself are a lawyer blandly telling a client how to stay out of trouble in practical terms When used to actively defend JKR and say she's just a woman asserting her rights and you can't judge her, it's scummy as fuck
1 reply 1 retweet 22 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Azuaron and
I’m pretty sure it’s the ‘a woman asserting her rights’ bit that’s really pissing off you and your minions.
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
It's the part where you're using that kind of language to defend an abusive billionaire's SLAPP lawsuits, yes, it's monstrously hypocritical
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.