You don’t ‘show’ where defamation occurs on Twitter, mate. You test it in court. Or you apologise before it reaches court because you’re advised you’ll lose. I hope that helps.
-
-
Replying to @MFnP @supersarr and
Defamation is an intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation. There are laws that impose penalties on defamatory statements. Holy shit, your vocabulary is so bad for someone who frequently criticisms other people's reading skills.
3 replies 0 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @Azuaron @supersarr and
Not in UK law. Search for defamation & intention.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MFnP @supersarr and
Holy shit is the "intentional" part not at issue, you absolute hack. Put up or shut up.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @Azuaron @supersarr and
You seem to be getting very angry about your misunderstanding of English law.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MFnP @supersarr and
What are you, a child, who thinks an argument can be deflected by yelling, "Look behind you!" Put up or shut up, hack. Where are the defamatory statements?
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @Azuaron @supersarr and
Again. There are no defamatory statements until a court has made a judgement. There may be potentially defamatory statement. I might think something is defamatory. You might think that. But until tested in court they are just statements.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MFnP @supersarr and
"There are no murders unless a court has made a judgment."


Again. Courts punish defamatory statements. The statements are defamatory independent of the courts.2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @Azuaron @supersarr and
Weird non sequitur. But in essence not 100% wrong. Which is why in England we have unlawful killing verdicts in the coroner’s courts, as well as a specific crime of manslaughter. The evidence is tested. However the relevance to defamation is tenuous to say the least
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Yes yes I know, you're a legal realist in the tradition of Oliver Wendell Holmes, "It ain't a strike or a ball until I call it" Nobody in real life actually thinks like this and if they did they'd be an insufferable bootlicker
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes
"So is OJ a murderer or not?" "Uh, HELLO -- his trial was on TV, they SAID he was not guilty, so BY DEFINITION he is not a murderer and never can be, read the Constitution" Fuck off
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.