No you aren't. You've not once shown where someone defamed JKR, which is what this whole conversation is about. You've lost every argument you started. Instead, you're pissing and moaning and insulting, trying to make a big old mess to distract from JKR's and your transphobia.
-
-
Replying to @Azuaron @supersarr and
You don’t ‘show’ where defamation occurs on Twitter, mate. You test it in court. Or you apologise before it reaches court because you’re advised you’ll lose. I hope that helps.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @MFnP @supersarr and
Defamation is an intentional false communication, either written or spoken, that harms a person's reputation. There are laws that impose penalties on defamatory statements. Holy shit, your vocabulary is so bad for someone who frequently criticisms other people's reading skills.
3 replies 0 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @Azuaron @supersarr and
Not in UK law. Search for defamation & intention.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MFnP @supersarr and
Holy shit is the "intentional" part not at issue, you absolute hack. Put up or shut up.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @Azuaron @supersarr and
You seem to be getting very angry about your misunderstanding of English law.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MFnP @supersarr and
What are you, a child, who thinks an argument can be deflected by yelling, "Look behind you!" Put up or shut up, hack. Where are the defamatory statements?
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @Azuaron @supersarr and
Again. There are no defamatory statements until a court has made a judgement. There may be potentially defamatory statement. I might think something is defamatory. You might think that. But until tested in court they are just statements.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MFnP @supersarr and
"There are no murders unless a court has made a judgment."


Again. Courts punish defamatory statements. The statements are defamatory independent of the courts.2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @Azuaron @supersarr and
Weird non sequitur. But in essence not 100% wrong. Which is why in England we have unlawful killing verdicts in the coroner’s courts, as well as a specific crime of manslaughter. The evidence is tested. However the relevance to defamation is tenuous to say the least
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Yes yes I know, you're a legal realist in the tradition of Oliver Wendell Holmes, "It ain't a strike or a ball until I call it" Nobody in real life actually thinks like this and if they did they'd be an insufferable bootlicker
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @MFnP and
"So is OJ a murderer or not?" "Uh, HELLO -- his trial was on TV, they SAID he was not guilty, so BY DEFINITION he is not a murderer and never can be, read the Constitution" Fuck off
3 replies 3 retweets 21 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.