-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @X_Warrior_P @supersarr and
Trending in Google ‘who is Arthur Chu’
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @MFnP @supersarr and
I see you've lost all the arguments in the other threads, so now you've moved on to throwing insults in a thread without arguments. Classic.
1 reply 0 retweets 29 likes -
Replying to @Azuaron @supersarr and
I’m multitasking. Apparently my pink lady brain makes this possible.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @MFnP @supersarr and
No you aren't. You've not once shown where someone defamed JKR, which is what this whole conversation is about. You've lost every argument you started. Instead, you're pissing and moaning and insulting, trying to make a big old mess to distract from JKR's and your transphobia.
1 reply 0 retweets 35 likes -
Replying to @Azuaron @supersarr and
You don’t ‘show’ where defamation occurs on Twitter, mate. You test it in court. Or you apologise before it reaches court because you’re advised you’ll lose. I hope that helps.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
A process which, as we have vividly seen demonstrated again and again, mostly depends on how much money the person threatening you has vs. how much you have
1 reply 3 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @MFnP and
If neither the "serious harm" threshold nor the honest opinion defence in the 2013 Defamation Act deterred this action, it seems like a significant setback to libel reform
1 reply 3 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @adambanksdotcom @MFnP and
Yuuuup I'm guessing the argument used behind closed doors re: "serious harm" is that JKR's reputation hasn't been as torched with young children as it has among her teen and adult fans, so The Day was exposing discussion of her transphobia to a new audience
2 replies 2 retweets 13 likes
If JKR really thinks she would've prevailed in court on the "honest opinion" defense though then that's evidence that that defense means nothing and basically doesn't exist
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @MFnP and
Yep. It seems very unlikely that she would, and more likely that this is nothing more or less than baseless intimidation from a position of financial power, but IANAL and that's just my opinion
0 replies 0 retweets 6 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.