except most if not all other writers did a lot better than her, thats the entire point.
-
-
No the point is if her books have been around awhile then they will sell less, that is the same with all authors. The hit of 1995 is not going to be the hit of 2020
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Do you think JK Rowling is the only author in the world with books still in print from before a few years ago
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
No that wasn't my point though
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If the discrepancy were just between old books and new ones no one would have noticed JKR's figures sticking out
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Funny that because every book shop I go in she's on the top twenty shelf and on my ebook 4 of her books are on the popular list
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yup all those other articles were a pure TRA conspiracy to cook the books, you've cracked it
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Thought so
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
They asked an analyst from the NPD Group, which does market research for publishing, specifically about this issue and she specifically said that, yes, JK Rowling's sales are lagging behind the curve to a significant degree not visible this time last year
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
But I'm sure she's just fudging the data because she's in the pocket of Big Trans All the market research and polling firms are, it's a billion-dollar investment
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes
It is so fucking grimly hilarious that you people act like this when we *know* who's controlling the narrative by threatening people and getting them to change their story, we can see it happening right in front of us and you're defending it
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.