I mean none of this is terribly complex.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SazCaz81 @skinbag77 and
I suggest you read the apology again.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I suggest you read their actual original statement, not the "apology" clearly written by JKR's lawyers that they published under legal threat.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Do you have a link to that?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This article has been edited. You cannot leave defamatory articles on line.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's an archived page, genius.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Did you mean the article rather than statement?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Do you actually think the statement about the article is a more reliable source about the contents of the article than just reading the article itself
3 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @MFnP and
If you wanna know why I'm so mad this is demonstrating why very clearly Like I hate that I'm the one invoking this term but this is Orwellian "I will not read the text of the original article to see whether JKR's claims had merit, because it's illegal now"
2 replies 2 retweets 23 likes
"The fact that you have a copy of a text deemed illegal and defamatory and are showing it to people means you are also complicit in defamation, and must also give JK Rowling a signed apology and a cash donation"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.