How is she racist/classist? I’m so confused on that one. Also have you heard of defamation law? You’re breaking them. Screenshot!
-
-
Look, if I were the judge I would toss that. And many US jurisdictions probably would, too. But I don’t think you’d get unanimity.
-
If the speaker were a former colleague, for example? I think view that the words could possibly imply undisclosed facts is t crazy
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I mean, I agree it's in theory an edge case, which is why said lawyer brought the suit, but I think I also agree with the judge that it falls on the other side of the line
-
and in a lot of cases (such as the inspiration for this whole discussion), bringing the case itself is a way to try to intimidate someone into backing down, even if it's not an actionable case
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In the UK this could absolutely be defamatory because it implies the existence of private facts, afaict. (Again, i'm not a lawyer. Commonwealth defamation law is of more than incidental interest to me these days though.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.