Not really, or at least not to any greater degree This absurd idea of throwing the corpus of someone's tweets before a jury and saying "Now evaluate this for hatefulness toward Black people" is about as absurd as "Now evaluate this for education level and erudition"
-
-
And yet you've been bullying and abusive all the way through this delightful conversation. Odd that.
-
Yup and my lawyers will be forcing a written apology and cash payment out of you any minute now, I'm terrible
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I looked this up and Danny Boyle did apparently successfully win a libel suit against the Daily Mirror in 2012 for referring to his routine as "racist" This is, as I understand the terminology they use over there, bollocks
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Said the abusive bully.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well Arthur, I'm guessing if your old mate Yaniv lived here he'd be using those libel laws as prolifically as his tampons and you'd be all 'well they have a right to defend themselves'
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bless. Unheard of 'stand up comedian' offers legally unqualified subjective opinion on "UK libel law" (when in fact there's no such thing) during farcically inept Twitter tirade on a host of topics he similarly knows fuck all about. Take a seat.pic.twitter.com/HV1ezP6GlU
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.