These are all, as Bryan helpfully reminded us, examples of insults that are matters of opinion and therefore cannot be legally actionable in a defamation suit, as opposed to his bizarre example of accusing someone of murdering civilians during wartime
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Same, and solidarity to you from a fellow terrified tea-stain.
End of conversation
-
-
-
If she sues someone in UK court they don't get to pick and choose which legal system they want
-
Sure, UK libel law sucks I'm not recommending that people stick their neck out and try their luck against her I'm rolling my eyes that this isn't bullying and abuse
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not saying UK law gets the balance right either, far from it, but can we at least acknowledge that "person with massive amounts of power and money smears some random as a neo-Nazi and defends it on the basis that it's technically not falsifiable" is not an ideal scenario?
-
Better than that selfsame rich person being able to sue some rando for everything they have because they called them a neo-Nazi on Twitter
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s also pretty easy to show that Rowling’s *is* transphobic even if one can not verify such things in a court of law.
But the school doesn’t have the resources to fight such a legal battle - which is what makes her act even more disgusting -
It's a publication produced by a proven right wing antagonist.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Then please feel free to stay where you are..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yeah I wouldn't want to live in a country where people's coping mechanism for living there is talking constantly about how another country is worse
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.