Steve Sailer There, that's exactly one name, and a name prominent enough to have a Wikipedia entry and everything It's been like six years and Scott never banned himhttps://twitter.com/WomanCorn/status/1282502157514801155 …
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect
Why was that so fucking hard? There's an actual conversation that can be had. Scott probably should have banned him, just on account of having him there makes that place less classy, yeah.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WomanCorn
You think his failure to do so was just a random brain fart on his part or did it speak to ideology Why didn't he ban nydwracu or Anissimov either
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect
I think he really really wanted a place where intellectual debates could happen between people who disagree, and that desire is vulnerable to people who can be impeccably polite while saying that some people are subhuman.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @WomanCorn @arthur_affect
I don't think he agreed with their position, just that he was extra vulnerable to their gambit.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WomanCorn
He considered himself a "left hereditarian", it wasn't subtle, he said so
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
Where was this? I don't remember seeing that. (Obviously an archive link will be needed.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
https://web.archive.org/web/20200615030810/https://slatestarcodex.com/2016/05/23/three-great-articles-on-poverty-and-why-i-disagree-with-all-of-them/ …pic.twitter.com/vYpI5Tapcw
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.