The majority of such situations do, in fact, involve parents
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @spqtemple02 and
You seem to be saying multiple things One of them is that no matter what system you create a child will develop a parent-like bond with exactly one authority figure so reform is fruitless (Or two, I guess, everyone needs a mommy and a daddy right)
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @spqtemple02 and
And, whatever Maybe that's true, but so what The next part is you saying that anyone who seeks out such a relationship should not be trusted Okay, I'm fine with that heuristic too WHY ARE YOU EXEMPTING PARENTS
3 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Nymphomachy and
I'm not exempting parents, I'm just not going to support a complete reformation of society that doesn't really solve the problems you suppose it does but is guaranteed to destroy the good that I know and love in my family and so many others.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @spqtemple02 @Nymphomachy and
The anti-nuclear family distributed-responsibility take isn't even that radical a take In the olden days the institution that stood in the place of parents was the extended family
1 reply 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @spqtemple02 and
That was far, far, far from perfect, and as an institution the extended family was still shitty in myriad ways - patriarchal, hierarchical, self-interested But not investing all authority and responsibility in two people was still pretty clearly preferable
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Nymphomachy and
It tended towards autocratic patriarchy by whatever male was considered the "head of the household". It was no better.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @spqtemple02 @Nymphomachy and
Lol like a nuclear family isn't just a smaller version of that? Like the *selling point* of the 1950s nuclear family wasn't that every single shitty middle class dude could be the "master of his castle"
1 reply 1 retweet 20 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @Nymphomachy and
You claimed it was better when it wasn't. That's it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @spqtemple02 @Nymphomachy and
There were many ways in which it wasn't better and many ways in which it was In terms of patriarchy it's a wash - every shitty low-rent dude getting to play paterfamilias wasn't a blow for equality, though it may have paved the way for such
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes
(Paving the way because those dudes FAILED to "keep their families together" and ended up being out of their kids' lives entirely, which was also a mixed bag but probably a net gain Single motherhood as our society practices abd supports it sucks though)
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @spqtemple02 and
If not full on family abolition then we might like at the abolition of fatherhood, specifically "Fatherhood" conceived by a gendered society as the parent who doesn't raise the kids but paid to have them raised and therefore still has the attendant rights and privileges
1 reply 2 retweets 14 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.